Understanding Colorado Unemployment Law: Navigating Section 8-73-108(5)(IVX) on Offensive Conduct

Jonathan Greschler
2 days ago
3 min read

Unemployment claims often hinge on the reasons behind an employee’s separation from work. In Colorado, Section 8-73-108(5)(IVX) of the unemployment law addresses conduct that can disqualify a former employee from receiving benefits. This section specifically covers rude, insolent, and offensive behavior. For employers and former employees alike, understanding this part of the law maybe essential to navigate unemployment claims effectively.

This post explains what Section 8-73-108(5)(IVX) entails, how the "reasonable person similarly situated" standard applies, and offers practical examples to clarify when conduct crosses the line. Whether you are an employer managing workplace discipline or a former employee facing an unemployment claim, this guide will help you understand your rights and responsibilities.

!Eye-level view of a Colorado state capitol building with clear sky

What Section 8-73-108(5)(IVX) Covers

Colorado Revised Statutes Section 8-73-108(5)(IVX) focuses on conduct that is rude, insolent, or offensive. This law is part of the broader framework that determines eligibility for unemployment benefits. If an employee is discharged for such conduct, they may be disqualified from receiving benefits.

Key Terms Defined

Rude conduct: Behavior that is disrespectful or impolite toward others.
Insolent conduct: Showing a lack of respect or contempt, often in a defiant or arrogant manner.
Offensive conduct: Actions or language that offend or insult others, potentially creating a hostile environment.

The law does not require conduct to be criminal or grossly inappropriate to result in disqualification. Less severe but clearly disrespectful behavior can qualify.

How the "Reasonable Person Similarly Situated" Standard Applies

A critical part of applying Section 8-73-108(5)(IVX) is the "reasonable person similarly situated" standard. This means that when deciding if conduct was rude, insolent, or offensive, the behavior is judged from the perspective of a reasonable person in the same situation.

What Does This Mean?

The standard is objective, not based on the employer’s or employee’s personal feelings.
It considers how a typical person with similar job duties and workplace context would view the conduct.
It helps avoid unfair judgments based on subjective or overly strict interpretations.

Example

If an employee raises their voice during a heated discussion with their supervisor, the question is whether a reasonable person who was the claimnat's supervisor in the same situation would find the behavior rude or offensive not was their supervsior offended. The supervsior being offended is relevant, but the supervisor may have been emotional themselves and overreacted.

What Employers Should Know

Employers must document incidents of rude, insolent, or offensive conduct carefully. Clear records help support decisions if an unemployment claim arises. Take written statements at the time and have the witnesses available for first hand testimony if the unemploymnet claim goes to a hearing.

Tips for Employers

Define expectations: Have clear workplace conduct policies.
Communicate clearly: Inform employees about consequences of offensive behavior.
Document incidents: Keep detailed notes, including dates, witnesses, and exact behavior.
Consider context: Evaluate whether the conduct truly meets the reasonable person standard.

What Former Employees Should Know

If you face unemployment denial based on rude or offensive conduct, understanding the law helps you respond effectively.

Tips for Former Employees

Review the reason for termination: Was your conduct truly rude or offensive under the circumstances?
Gather evidence: Emails, witness statements, or other proof can support your case.
Understand the standard: Your behavior is judged by how a reasonable person would see it, ask a few non-work friends.
Appeal if necessary: You have the right to challenge a denial of benefits to a hearing where you can explain the workplace enviroment and why the behavior or comment happened in context. What is acceptable at a construction site is not the same as what is acceptable in a dental office.

Balancing Workplace Respect and Fairness

The law aims to balance protecting employers’ rights to a respectful workplace with fairness to employees. Not every disagreement or moment of frustration leads to disqualification. The "reasonable person similarly situated" standard ensures decisions are fair and context-sensitive.